
Rethinking the Operation
In looking at these foundations, we wanted to find out how they thought about their missions and structures. In what areas were their choices, driven by mission, different from those of more traditional foundations?
Some of our questions included:
What are the goals of the foundation? How was the lifespan, payout, or structure determined as a way of accomplishing those goals?
- How are grantmaking policies affected when a foundation is time-limited, or adopts some other unusual structure?
- How is the foundation's relationship with its grantees affected? Are there special responsibilities that the foundation should assume (e.g., extraordinary exit strategies for its grantees, such as endowment grants)?
- How are its commitments to its employees affected?
- What evaluation procedures does the foundation use for its work?
- What is the financial model for a foundation that is a. time limited, b. has a higher payout, c. has a flexible payout depending on opportunities, d. is both a charitable and investment operation?
- How is the investment strategy affected?
- How is governance affected?
- Are there legal or tax issues?
- How might the foundation best document its experience and its legacy?
Each of the foundations profiled here grappled with these questions. Rather than outline a comprehensive history for each, we have chosen to highlight particularly instructive lessons learned for each.
[ 1 | 2 | 3 | FOCUS >> ]
|

Resources

Report Contents

Upcoming Events

Supporters of
“Beyond 5%”
Design by Ian Hewitt-Woods
|